1 Peter 3:8-9 (Part 1)


I Peter 3:8-9
(A Bible Study Led by Dr. Larry Reynolds)
August 29, 2013
 
1.      I have always had a keen interest in World War II...think that is because my father fought in that war in the European theater...while he rarely will talk about his experiences in the war, I did convince him to allow me to have a copy of his military discharge papers...from those papers I discovered that he—
--was only 19 years old when he was drafted into the army in 1943 and had just turned 22 when he was discharged at the end of the war...
--was a platoon sergeant in Company L of the 22nd Infantry...
--led machine gun squads and 60 MM mortar squads in combat in France, Belgium, Luxemburg, and Germany...
2.      And because of dad’s reluctance to talk about his experiences in World War II, I have found myself reading as much as I can about the war to help me better understand what he experienced during that time in his life...one of my favorite writers about World War II is Stephen Ambrose, the well-known military historian...one of his books is entitled The Victors, Eisenhower and His Boys: The Men of World War II...in one part of that book Ambrose describes how General George C. Marshall selected the top officers who would lead America’s war effort...listen to what Ambrose wrote about that selection process:
“Marshall headed a stupendous organization.  To do so effectively he needed assistants he could trust.  In picking them, he took professional competence for granted and concentrated on personality traits.  Certain types were, in his view, unsuited for high command.  Foremost among these were those who were self-seeking in the matter of promotion.  Next came those who always tried to ‘pass the buck.’  Officers who tried to do everything themselves and consequently got bogged down in detail were equally unsatisfactory.  Men who shouted or pounded on the desk were as unacceptable to Marshall as men who had too great a love of the limelight.  Nor could he abide a pessimist.  He surrounded himself with men who ... concentrated on the possibilities rather than the difficulties.” [Ambrose, pp.19-20]
3.      There are many similarities between the kind of people General Marshall desired for his high command, and the description in 1 Peter 3:8-9 of how God’s people should live.  These two verses are the conclusion of a large section of I Peter beginning in 2:13 where Peter addresses the question of how Christians should relate to the world.  We saw two weeks ago that the general principle which permeates this section is that Christians should be characterized by a spirit of submission--a spirit of voluntary selflessness...in—
--2:13-16 Peter applies the principle of voluntary selflessness to the relationship between Christians and their government...
--2:18-25 Peter applies the principle of voluntary selflessness to the relationship between Christian slaves and their masters...
            --3:1-7 Peter applies the principle of voluntary selflessness to the relationship between Christian wives and their husbands...
Then, in the verses on which we’re going to focus in this session, Peter sums up how Christians should relate to other people.
 
T.S.‑ Notice word "all" in the phrase “let all be” in v.8...that is an important word...by using that word Peter is saying these characteristics to follow not optional for Christians...they are not things from  which can pick and choose...they are not just for few super‑spiritual Christians...instead these are things which should be  in life of every true Christian...in these verses are six characteristics which should be evident in the life of every genuine Christian...we’re going to focus on the first three characteristics in this session and the last three in the next session...
 
 I.       Every Christian should be “harmonious”
1.      The Greek word which is translated “harmonious” in the NASB and “of one mind” in the KJV is homophron...this is the only place in the NT this word is used...homoprhon is made up of two other Greek words...homos which means the same or together...and phren which is a primitive word for heart or mind...so the word means to be together in heart or in mind or to be of the same heart or mind...
2.      The word does not mean that we are to be exactly like...it doesn’t mean that there are to be no differences among Christians... invariably, wherever Christians gather there will be—
--a wide range of opinions on certain theological issues...not every Christian will interpret every part of God’s Word in the same way...
--a variety of preferences and tastes when it comes to worship...some prefer a more traditional worship style...others prefer a more contemporary style...still others desire a blending of the two...
--differing levels of interest in the various disciplines of the Christian life...some will lean more toward ministry...others will have a passion for evangelism...some will have a special interest in missions...others are drawn toward discipleship and Christian education...
3.      And being “harmonious” does not mean that we must do away with all differences...instead, it means that we do not allow our differences to become barriers to fellowship between us and or fellow Christians...it means to have the kind of spirit about us which makes it possible for us to blend together with our brothers and sisters in Christ into a unified whole, into a fellowship of people who are together in heart...
4.      To say that I am not a musician would be an understatement...you could write all I know about music on the palm of your hand...but I think I do know the difference between unison and harmony... unison is when everyone is on the same note...harmony is when different notes are being sung or played, but they blend together into a single sound...

5.      That’s the way it should be among God’s people...we don’t have to all sing the same note...but we do need to learn to blend with our fellow believers to present a united front and a beautiful sound to our world...we are to be “harmonious”...
 
II.  Every Christian should be “sympathetic”
1.      Look the next word on this list of qualities...like the word translated “harmonious” this is the only place this particular word is used in the NT...and like the word translated “harmonious” it is made up of two other words...
--the first part of the word translated “sympathetic” (sunpathes) is from a preposition meaning together or together with (sun)...
--the last part of the word is from a verb meaning to suffer...
So the word means to suffer with or to feel with another...
2.      It is very close to our word empathy...to having the ability of putting yourself in another person’s shoes...to feel what that person feels...to see things as that person sees them...
3.   In the Scripture the church is described as the body of Christ...we, as individual Christians, are all parts of that body...and as parts of the same body we are to look after each other...
4.   This is a principle which is often repeated in Scripture...in the book of—
--Romans we are instructed to “rejoice with those who rejoice and weep with those who weep...”
--Galatians we are told to “Bear one another’s burdens, and thus fulfill the law of Christ...”
--Philippians we are reminded to “not merely look out for your own personal interest, but also for the interests of others...”
 
3.      In the publication Brian’s Lines Brian Harbour tells of an instructor in a nursing school who gave the class a pop quiz...the  last question of the quiz was, “What is first name of the woman who cleans the school?”...all of the students had seen the woman but had never bothered to learn her name...when they asked the instructor why that question was on the test he replied, “In your careers you will meet many people.  All of them are significant.  They deserve your attention and care...”
4.      That’s what it means to be sympathetic...genuinely caring for others...
 
III.  Every Christian should be “brotherly”
1.      The word translated “brotherly” is philadelphos...like the first two words on this list, it is also a compound word...the first part, philos, carries the idea of beloved and the second part, adelphos, means brother...
2.      This is the word that was commonly used in the 1st century to describe the affectionate feelings members of a family should have for each other...and what Peter is saying is that Christians should relate to each other as brothers and sisters...
3.      I like how one writer puts it:


“We must love each other, because we are members of one family.  We are not strangers to each other within the Christian church; much less are we isolated units; we are brothers and sisters of each other, because we have the one Father, even God.  The Christian church is not a collection of acquaintances; it is not even a gathering of friends; it is a family of God.” [Barclay, Romans 12]

4.      The year was 1913...it was the 50th anniversary of the Battle of Gettysburg, one of the bloodiest battles in the history of our nation...many aging veterans of the War Between the States gathered on Gettysburg on that 50th anniversary to re-enact Pickett’s charge, which was a key part of the Battle of Gettysburg ...the Union veterans took their places behind some rocks up on a ridge..the Confederate veterans started marching toward them across the field below, the field that 50 years earlier was covered with the dead and wounded...as the two armies met on the day of the re-enact, an incredible thing happened...instead of doing battle as they had done 50 years before, the aging men through their arms around each other and wept...

5.      That’s how it should be in the family of God...instead of doing battle with each other, we should be embracing, encouraging, and upholding one another...

            CONCLUSION

1.      B.B. McKinney, the well-known musician and hymn writer wrote these words:

If I can plant a rose where thorns have been

Dispel the gloom, and let the sunshine in;

If I can help some broken life to rise again,

I shall not live in vain.

 

If I can sing a song of love and cheer,

Some song that lifts a soul from doubt and fear,

And bring them back to know that God is always near,

I shall not live in vain.

 

If I can be a light wher-e’er I go,

A light to shine for those in sin and woe,

If I can lead some soul my living Christ to know,

I shall not live in vain.

2.      I think that is something of what this part of God’s Word is saying to us...our lives are not lived in vain when we are—

--“harmonious toward others...when we are of the same heart with them...

--sympathetic toward others...when we allow our selves to feel what they feel and see what they see...

--”brotherly” toward others...when we treat those around us as family...
Those are characteristics of real Christians...

1 Peter 2:13-3:7


I Peter 2:13-3:7
(A Bible Study Led by Dr. Larry Reynolds)
August 15, 2013
           
1.      No doubt you are familiar with the old saying about not being able to see the forest for the trees...think the basic idea behind that proverbial statement is that sometimes can get so bogged down in and so distracted by the details of something that lose sight of the big picture...
2.      In our study of the New Testament letter of I Peter we have come to a section where, if we are not careful, we will end up seeing the trees but missing the forest...seeing the details but overlooking the primary biblical principle being taught...last week, from I Peter 2:11-12 explored two reasons that we should live God’s way...we saw that we should live God’s way because—
--this world is not all there is to our existence...
--other people are watching us and being influenced by our example...
Having said that in vv.11-12, in v.13 Peter begins a long discourse giving specific examples of what it means to live God’s way...from 2:13 through 3:7 Peter, using specific life-situations which were of special interest to people living in the 1st century, talks about how we, as God’s people, should relate to the world in which we live...
3.      How to relate to the world is an age-old dilemma for Christians...on the surface, at least, the Bible seems to give us conflicting direction on this issue...on the one hand, the Bible warns us about being too involved with the world...for example—
--John wrote that we are “...not love the world, nor the things in the world.  If anyone loves the world, the love of the Father is not in him.” [I John 2:15]
--James spoke of genuine religion as keeping “oneself unstained from the world.” [James 1:27]
--Paul pointed out that “...we have not received the spirit of the world, but the Spirit who is from God...”
So, on the one hand the Bible tells us to be separate from the world... however, on the other hand the Bible consistently reminds us that we have a responsibility to the world...
--Jesus described His followers as “...the light of the world...” in the Sermon on the Mount...[Matt.5:14]
--and Jesus told His followers that their mission was “...to make disciples of all nations (of all the world)...”[Matt.28:19]
4.      This tension between Christians being “in the world” but not “of the world” has always existed and it’s always been difficult for Christians to deal with...historically, God’s people have gone to either one of two extremes in their relationship with the world...the 1st century Jewish sects of the Pharisees and the Sadducees are good examples of those two extremes…
--some have chosen the way of the Pharisees...they have withdrawn from the world...they have hidden themselves away in monasteries, communes, or other safe enclaves, putting as much distance as possible between themselves and the real world...


--others have chosen the way of the Sadducees...they have overly identified with the world...they have so identified with the world, accepting the world’s standards and values and priorities,  that they have nothing of value to say to the world...
5.      It is my conviction that Christians should avoid both of those extremes...we must not withdraw from the world and we must not be absorbed by the world...and the section of I Peter at which we are going to look in this session gives us some instruction on how to do that...we are going to cover in this session a rather lengthy passage…important to see it in its context, so I’m going to read I Peter 2:13-3:7…I know that is risky because it’s easy to lose your attention doing that...but I think it is important for us to see the big picture, the over-riding principle before we begin looking at some of the details of this passage...I want to encourage you to follow along in your Bible as I read...
 
T.S. - The theme that runs throughout this passage is the theme of submission...in--
--2:13 all Christians are instructed to submit to the institution of gov’t...
--2:18 servants are instructed to submit to their masters...
--3:1 wives instructed to submit to their husbands...
Obviously cannot understand this passage without understanding what is meant by the concept of submission...the Greek word translated “submit” or “be submissive” throughout this passage is HUPOTASSO...it is a compound word...the first part HUPO is a preposition meaning by or under...the second part TASSO comes from a verb meaning “to arrange or to draw up in order”...
--sometimes was used in a military sense to describe soldiers lining up according to rank...many people carry that military interpretation over into the biblical use of the word...however, I think to do so violates a basic teaching of Jesus...when the disciples got into an argument about who would have the positions of most authority in His kingdom, Jesus called them to Him and said, “You know that the rulers of the Gentiles lord it over them, and their great men exercise authority over them.  It is not so among you, but whoever wishes to become great among you shall be your servant, and whoever wishes to be first among you shall be your slave...”...and I think to interpret HUPOTASSO to mean that one Christian or one class of Christians is over another Christian or another class of Christian violates that teaching of Jesus...it also violates Ephesians 5:21 where we are instructed to “be subject to one another” out of reverence for Christ...


--there is another way to interpret that word...William Barclay says the word means “voluntary selflessness” [p.260]...it is an attitude of humility, of seeking the best for others, of refusing to be independent, autocratic, and overly-assertive...it’s the kind of spirit expressed in Philippians 2:3-4 which instructs us to “Do nothing from selfishness or empty conceit, but with humility of mind let each of you regard one another as more important than himself; do not merely look out for your own personal interest, but also for the interests of others.”...in my opinion that interpretation of HUPOTASSO is much more in keeping with what we see in the life of Jesus and what the NT teaches about our relationships as Christians...
And the basic principle which is interwoven throughout this part of I Peter is that Christians should relate to the world with a spirit of humility, selflessness, and a spirit which always seeks the best for others...
 
In this passage, Peter applies that principle to three specific areas of relationship which were of particular concern to Christians living in the 1st century...
2:13-17 applies the principle of submission to the relationship between Christians and gov’t
1.      This was an especially pressing issue for the church in the later part of the 1st century...most scholars believe written shortly after great  fire which destroyed much of Rome in A.D. 64...at  first, Roman population blamed fire on Nero, the  Roman Emperor...had passion for building and believed  set fire or at least let it burn so could rebuild Rome suit his own liking...to divert wrath from himself, blamed fire on Christians...under his leadership, great gov't sponsored persecution broke out  against Christians...
2.      Raised new problem for Christians...up this time Rome  had been at best sympathetic toward them and at worst  neutral...but now, gov't was hostile...how should  Christians relate to hostile gov't?...Peter's instruction in 1 Peter 2:13-17 was, as far as possible, be submissive and cooperative...
 
2:18-25 applies this principle of submission to the relationship between slaves and masters
1.      This was another critical issue facing the church...slavery was a common institution in the 1st century....it’s been estimated that there were approximately 60 million slaves in the Roman Empire, which may have been about 1/4 of the population...
2.      In the church there were people who were slaves and masters...in some cases, a slave and his/her master was part of the same congregation, as in the case of Onesimus and Philemon in the church at Colossae...this raised all sorts of moral and ethical issues for the young church...in a time when the idea of slavery was ingrained into the very culture, how should Christians deal with the issue?...
3.      Peter’s instruction to the slaves was to relate to their masters with a spirit of humility and selflessness...
 
3:1-7 applies this principle of submission to the husband/wife relationship


1.      It is obvious from the NT that the relationship between husbands and wives was a key issue for the early church...it is dealt with in depth in at least three different places--Ephesians 5, Colossians 3, and here in I Peter 3...

2.      It is important to remember the cultural situation in which these instructions were written...in the 1st century world women had absolutely no legal standing...they were considered to be property, first belonging to their fathers and then belonging to their husbands...

3.      In Christianity, women found a new freedom unheard of until that point in time...as you read about the church in the NT, time and again will come across the names of women who made significant contributions to the ministry...

4.      However, it appears that some of the women were using their freedom, especially in relation to their non-Christian husbands, in a way that was considered scandalous by the culture of that day...and Peter instructs them to relate to their husbands not with a spirit of assertiveness and independence but with a spirit of humility and selflessness...

 

Now listen carefully to what I’m about to say...in instructing--

--Christians to submit to the Roman government, Peter wasn’t endorsing the totalitarian form of gov’t which characterized the Roman Empire....

--servants to submit to their masters, Peter wasn’t endorsing the institution of slavery...

--wives to submit to their husbands, Peter was endorsing the prevailing cultural view of his day that women were inferior to men...

Instead, he was reminding Christians in his day and in our day as well, that we should relate to the world in a way that doesn’t bring disrepute upon the on the way of Jesus Christ...and that way is the way of humility, of selflessness, of seeking the best for others...

CONCLUSION

1.      In the book The Parables of the Gospels by Hugh Martin there is a story about a rather rough, uncultured man who for some reason fell in love with a beautiful vase in a shop window. Eventually he bought the vase and put it on the mantel in his room.  There it became a kind of judgment on its surroundings. He had to clean up the room to make it worthy of the vase.  The curtains looked dingy beside it. The old chair with the stuffing coming out of the seat would not do.  The wallpaper and the paint needed redoing.  Gradually the whole room was transformed by the presence of the vase.

2.      And that’s the kind of impact Christians should have on their world ...and we are able to impact our world in that way by allowing ourselves to be characterized by humility, by selflessness, and by seeking the best for others...

1 Peter 2:11-12


I Peter 2:11-12
(A Bible Study Led by Dr. Larry Reynolds)
August 8, 2013
                                                        
1.      Carol and I spent most of last week in Austin taking care of grandchildren while our daughter and son-in-law were away on a trip.  Our daughter, Christi, and her husband, Chris, have three children—Ryleigh (14), Landon (10), and Luke (8).  After spending most of the week doing things like riding water slides as Schlitterbahn in New Braunsfel and playing laser tag at Main Event, I was reminded once again why God gives children to us when we are young! 
2.      For a few days it was as if Carol and I had children in our home again.  Several times this week Luke, the youngest of the three grandchildren in Austin, challenged some decision we would make with the one word question that has the capacity of driving parents to the brink of insanity – WHY?  I think one reason that little word “why” is so annoying to parents is that sometimes we find it very difficult to explain to a child the rationale for our decisions.  So, more or less in self-defense, we resort to our own favorite word which annoys our children and just say “because” or “because I said so.”
3.      Anyone who takes the time to read the Bible can see quite easily that in this book God give us many specific instructions concerning how to live in this world.  It’s obvious from this book that God has certain standards for His people and that He wants us to live in a certain way.  And I’m glad that the Bible doesn’t respond to our questions about why we should live God’s way with a great big divine “because I said so!”  Instead, the bible gives us specific, concrete reasons as to why we should live God’s way.  And in our journey through 1 Peter we have come to a couple of verses that provide us some of the reasons we should live as God instructs us to live.  Look at I Peter 2:11-12.
 


T.S. - The basic command in this paragraph is in first part of v.11 where we're told "to abstain from fleshly lusts"...important to understand what is meant by that...that's an easy phrase to misunderstand…
“to abstain” - This is literally “continue to hold yourself back from” (i.e. PRESENT MIDDLE INFINITIVE). Believers must continue to struggle with sin and temptation (cf. Rom. 7). The battle with evil does not cease at salvation. In many ways it intensifies. When one believes in and receives Christ he/she is indwelt by the Spirit (cf. Rom. 8:9) and given the divine nature (cf. II Pet. 1:4). However, this does not mean that the old sin nature is removed. It is made inoperative by Christ’s finished work on our behalf (cf. Rom. 6).
 
The rabbis say that in every human’s heart is a black and a white dog. The one you feed the most becomes the biggest. Believers face the continuing choice of seeking the good, dwelling on righteousness, walking in light, or reactivating the old sin nature! [1]
 
“fleshly lusts” - Our natural tendency is to equate "fleshly lusts" with physical sins such as sins of sex or drunkenness or gluttony or the like...but in NT word "flesh" is generally given much broader meaning than just the physical body...it is used to mean "human nature apart from God"...the war waging inside of every person (the verb “wage war” is in the present tense denoting continuous action) is between our old nature (before Christ) and our new nature (after Christ)…the command "to abstain from fleshly lusts" means "Don't live your way; live God's way"...and in these verses Peter gives us two specific reasons why we should “…abstain from fleshly lusts…” or live God's way...
 
I.    We should live God's way because this world is not all there is
1.   Notice how Peter addresses his first century readers and us in v.11...after calling them “beloved” which literally means “much loved ones” Peter reminds his readers that they are "aliens' and "strangers"...those are two very common Greek words...
--"aliens" was used to describe person who had no legal standing/rights in a country...
--"strangers" was used to describe person who was only temporary residents of a country...
Based on the common usage of those words, some interpreters take this statement to mean this letter was addressed to people who were not citizens of Roman Empire and had no legal rights as citizens...
2.   However, think means much more than that...the same words used elsewhere in Scripture in special way...used to describe wanderings of--
--Abraham and the other Hebrew patriarchs who went around seeking the land God had for them...
--of the Israelites in land of Egypt where were in bondage and slavery before entering promised land...
And by using these particular words to address us Peter is saying, "Remember how God's people in OT lived for time in land wasn't theirs...in place where were strangers and pilgrims...that's your experience now...your true, permanent citizenship is not in this world...here only temporarily...real home is heaven...as journey through this world, don't lose sight of that!"
 


1.      Mikel Gorbechev was the General Secretary of the Communist Party in the Soviet Union from 1985 until 1991.  He had a favorite story to which he often referred that he said summed up his philosophy of life.  There was a young prince who came to power in Russia...desired rule country well...so asked wise men of his country share their wisdom with him so he could rule wisely...after 10 years sent him 10 wagons loaded with books containing the thoughts of the wise men..."Who has time read all this?  Must govern my people.  Distill into shorter form."...10 more years passed and they brought him 10 volumes...this was still too much to read and he asked them to reduce their wisdom even more...5 more years passed and they brought him one thick volume... but by this time he was an old man and on his deathbed...he asked the wise men to sum up their wisdom in a single sentence...they replied, "People are born.  People suffer.  People die."
2.   But that's not the sum total of wisdom....not only are people born...not only do people sometimes suffer...not only do people die...but after death, people continue to exists...
 
1.   And if we really believe that...if really believe--
--there's more to our existence than just our time in this world...
--in God and an after-life and a judgment...
then have every reason for living as God desires that we live...
2.   On other hand, if really believe--
--this world is all there is...
--there is no judgment and no ultimate accountability...
then we have every reason to join the eat, drink, be merry, and do your own thing crowd...
3.   We must never forget this world is not our permanent and final home...must not become so tied to this world that we forget the ways of God...one reason we should live God's way is because this world is not all there is...
 
II.  We should live God's way because others are watching us
1.   Christians in first century world were subject of all sorts of false, slanderous, outrageous accusations...Peter alludes to that when he speaks in v.12 of them being “slandered as evil doers...”...we saw earlier in this study that there were those who viewed the 1st century Christians as--
--atheists because they refused to believe in the many gods of the Romans and Greeks...since they were monotheistic, believing in only one God, people viewed them as basically unbelievers...
--cannibals because they spoke of eating the body and drinking the blood of Jesus in reference to the Lord's Supper...
--immoral because they met in homes for an occasion they called love feasts or agape feasts...
--traitors because they would not bow down and call Caesar lord...instead of saying Caesar is lord they would proclaim Jesus is Lord...


2.   Peter himself had felt the brunt of these false, slanderous charges...and he knew the only way Christians could deny these charges was to live in way that would prove them to be false...so he tells them in v.12, "Live God's way because the world is watching you.  And through the influence of your example those who are watching and evaluating may turn to God."

3.   The phrase “…day of visitation…” at the end of verse 12 is very interesting.  This refers to any time that God draws near, either for blessing or for judgment (cf. Isa. 10:3; Jer. 8:12; 10:15; 11:23; 23:12; 46:21; 48:44; 50:27; 51:18; Hos. 9:7; Mic. 7:4). It can be temporal or eschatological (cf. Luke 19:44). Some see this as relating to believers on trial, but in context it seems to refer to any opportunity for the unsaved to hear and respond to Jesus as Savior before they face Him as Judge.[2]

 

1.   There's a story told of Plato, the Greek philosopher...he was once told a certain man was going all over the country making false accusations about him...Plato's response was, "Then, I will live in such a way that no one will believe what he says." And that's exactly how God calls His people to live.

 

1.   See in I Peter 2:12 a great, timeless truth...and that truth is the best argument for Christianity is a real Christian...whether--

--like it or not...

--want admit in or not...

--desire accept responsibility of it or not...

everyone of us who bears the name Christian is a walking advertisement for Christianity...

2.   Question we all must face is: 

--Is my life a positive influence for Christ or is it a negative influence?...

--Are people drawn to Christ by way I live or does my life tend push people away from Christ?...

should live God's way because others are watching us...

 

                                           CONCLUSION

 

1.   Someone has said:  "You can spend your life any way you like.  But you can only spend it once!"

2.   As you spend or live your life, live it God's way!...why?--

--because this world is not all there is...

--and because others are watching and being influenced by us...

3.      Text (I Peter 2:11-12)



[1] Utley, R. J. D. (2000). Vol. Volume 2: The Gospel according to Peter: Mark and I & II Peter. Study Guide Commentary Series (230). Marshall, Texas: Bible Lessons International.
[2] Utley, R. J. D. (2000). Vol. Volume 2: The Gospel according to Peter: Mark and I & II Peter. Study Guide Commentary Series (231). Marshall, Texas: Bible Lessons International.